Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics61.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 28 '19 at 21:36
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 89.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 247
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 981
87% 737 Pts
64-Core 1,347
83% 1,347 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.1% Good
Lighting 76.2
Reflection 77.9
Parallax 64.3
62% 72.8 fps
MRender 71.4
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 73.2
59% 71.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
280GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 854 583 590 592 598 590 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,520
Write 2,364
Mixed 1,644
SusWrite 634
400% 1,791 MB/s
4K Read 61.7
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 81.3
271% 93.7 MB/s
DQ Read 975
DQ Write 768
DQ Mixed 919
675% 888 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 263%
Great: 340%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
391GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 494 368 329 329 329 329 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 493
Mixed 349
SusWrite 363
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 60.4
205% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 351
270% 366 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%
WDC WDS2 40G2G0A-00JH 240GB
205GB free
Firmware: UF45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 96 107 116 129 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 384
Write 150
Mixed 132
SusWrite 123
43% 197 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 22
4K Mixed 12.4
55% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 56
DQ Mixed 24.7
34% 63.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 50%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$30
418GB free
Firmware: 0002LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 110 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 114
Write 106
Mixed 52
SusWrite 110
70% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 61%
WD Elements 1TB
187GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 57 57 55 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 63.8
Write 65.5
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 56.9
77% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 32.8
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 39.8
SC Mixed 29.3
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $578
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback