Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell Precision Tower 5810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds)
Memory	56.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160701
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '19 at 20:35
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 1,056 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 67.6 2-Core 158 61% 103 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 579 52% 437 Pts	64-Core 1,252 78% 1,252 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.78 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Lighting 41.2 Reflection 40.5 Parallax 37.2 34% 39.6 fps	MRender 50.7 Gravity 37.3 Splatting 39 34% 42.3 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 414GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 368 361 432 423 428 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	98.9% Outstanding	Read 430 Write 317 Mixed 342 SusWrite 393 83% 370 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 71.7 4K Mixed 42.1 135% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 306 239% 331 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 623GB free Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 448 413 436 437 437 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 464 Write 437 Mixed 378 SusWrite 434 96% 428 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 85.6 4K Mixed 41.2 144% 52.4 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 354 266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GR7AFR8N-UH 4x16GB 295 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB RIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	132% Outstanding	MC Read 60.1 MC Write 53.9 MC Mixed 48.7 155% 54.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 16.2 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 75.3 53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 134%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	413x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	384x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	286x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	108x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	105x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	62x

RAM
HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GBHynixBench 90%, 1,961 samples	346x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	208x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 4x8GBMicronBench 93%, 857 samples	193x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16