| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds) |
| Memory | 39 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180803 |
| Uptime | 0.6 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 28 '19 at 19:36 |
| Run Duration | 109 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-9920X-$587
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
80.4%
Excellent
|
82% 154 Pts
|
83% 694 Pts
|
130% 2,092 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Zotac(19DA 4471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
120%
Outstanding
|
133% 181 fps
|
111% 137 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$275
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 438 421 450 451 433 MB/s
|
100%
Outstanding
|
90% 397 MB/s
|
133% 52.7 MB/s
|
225% 326 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 6x8GB
6 of 8 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
74.9%
Very good
|
85% 29.7 GB/s
|
30% 10.5 GB/s
|
40% 99.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 179x |
| Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 133x |
| Core i9-7900XIntel $462Bench 82%, 19,432 samples | 121x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 81x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 68x |
| RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 39x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $1,145 |