Asus F2A55-M

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus F2A55-M (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140919
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '19 at 19:07
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 88.4 1-Core 71.3 2-Core 120 59% 93.3 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 207 28% 208 Pts	64-Core 199 12% 199 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174 49,592 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Asus(1043 042C) 2GB CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Lighting 25.9 Reflection 27.7 Parallax 33.7 21% 29.1 fps	MRender 24.6 Gravity 20.6 Splatting 32.7 22% 26 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 191 185 180 173 168 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	73.6% Very good	Read 241 Write 227 Mixed 224 SusWrite 183 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 66.9 4K Mixed 43.9 146% 48.8 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 163 122% 163 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 128%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB 21,039 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 325GB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 34 Write 30.8 Mixed 30.7 SusWrite 13.4 20% 27.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.9 197% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 67%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 292GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 122 121 120 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 76.5 Write 97.8 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 120 68% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB 13,194 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1TB free Firmware: 0911 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 30.2 Mixed 31.2 SusWrite 13.3 20% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.5 184% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 103%
Seagate FreeAgent 1.5TB 1,031 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 205GB free, PID 3008 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 29 Mixed 22 SusWrite 11.1 30% 23.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 8GB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 12.6 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 11 27% 9.43 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F2A55-M Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A55-M

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	16x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	13x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	7x
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	7x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x

SSD
CS900 480GBPNY $42Bench 79%, 17,946 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	3x

RAM
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 8GBUnknownBench 38%, 500 samples	4x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	3x
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBUnknownBench 33%, 442 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $161

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16