Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190318
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '19 at 01:21
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Memory 87.3 1-Core 114 2-Core 204 78% 135 Pts	4-Core 406 8-Core 728 68% 567 Pts	64-Core 1,214 75% 1,214 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 377A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.1% Below average	Lighting 39.6 Reflection 45.8 Parallax 36.9 32% 40.8 fps	MRender 56.7 Gravity 39.6 Splatting 51.7 40% 49.3 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z33130RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 95 90 102 90 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 450 Write 373 Mixed 367 SusWrite 103 72% 323 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 63.7 4K Mixed 6.7 71% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 15.6 61% 133 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 86%
Sandisk S240G 3TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 2TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 34 33 33 34 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 170 Write 33 Mixed 36.2 SusWrite 33.3 15% 68.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 2% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 23%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87 14,331 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 148 148 150 145 147 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	64.3% Good	Read 80.8 Write 125 Mixed 68.2 SusWrite 142 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.6 224% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB 7,409 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	68% Good	MC Read 24.7 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 20.5 68% 23.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 27.2 SC Mixed 22.3 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 111%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 150%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 139%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,504x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,316x
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	1,129x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,351x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	1,044x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	802x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	740x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	586x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	524x

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,266

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16