Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '19 at 21:40
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 83.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 240
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 710
74% 592 Pts
64-Core 968
60% 968 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Lighting 92.7
Reflection 83.4
Parallax 74.1
76% 83.4 fps
MRender 71.3
Gravity 78.2
Splatting 73.4
61% 74.3 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9001b31 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1117 1109 1123 1120 1123 360 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,944
Write 1,062
Mixed 853
SusWrite 992
269% 1,213 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 57.8
222% 85.2 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 813
DQ Mixed 465
386% 538 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 232%
Great: 244%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 204 202 201 203 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 201
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 203
126% 174 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 118%
Great: 113%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
10GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 7.4 9.5 9 8.6 8.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 6.5
Mixed 11.3
SusWrite 7.8
16% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 4.1
287% 5.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2933 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 33.9
110% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 29.8
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $578
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback