HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150324
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJun 27 '19 at 12:01
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 171
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 330
40% 306 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 20.3
18% 19.9 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 17.2
17% 21.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 154 141 49 112 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
61% Good
Read 439
Write 381
Mixed 234
SusWrite 115
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 22.1
86% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 175
145% 212 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 61%
Great: 101%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$61
93GB free
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 389 397 406 329 387 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 474
Write 403
Mixed 321
SusWrite 384
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 23.2
104% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 277
224% 318 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 119%
Hitachi HDS721025CLA682 250GB
180GB free
Firmware: JP1OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 129 129 129 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 128
Write 126
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 127
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.1% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 10.9
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback