Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory	3.4 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100609
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '19 at 21:55
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 67.2 2-Core 151 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 356 31% 263 Pts	64-Core 366 23% 366 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 74%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$55 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 267GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR010 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 156 Write 70 Mixed 128 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 9.9 4K Write 15.6 4K Mixed 8.9 35% 11.5 MB/s	DQ Read 9.5 DQ Write 42.2 DQ Mixed 14.7 14% 22.1 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB ID:02 FE EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F ID:07 02 51264V160K ID:01 98 99U5458-005.A01LF 52GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.8% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 6.2 21% 7.2 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 8.4 25% 8.6 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	285x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	65x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	56x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	13x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 44GBUnknownBench 30%, 232 samples	13x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16