HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G1

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 73% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 213E
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140429
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '19 at 16:56
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	52%
CPU Throttled	73%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4650U 4,310 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Memory 78.2 1-Core 30 2-Core 77.6 42% 61.9 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 130 17% 126 Pts	64-Core 127 8% 127 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 6,906 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 213E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	3.54% Terrible	Lighting 3.63 Reflection 4.35 Parallax 7 3% 4.99 fps	MRender 6.29 Gravity 2.63 Splatting 7.48 5% 5.47 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.54% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 SATA M.2 256GB 2,150 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 182GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231306 SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 219 267 260 274 341 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 381 Write 315 Mixed 212 SusWrite 272 66% 295 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 28.1 4K Mixed 13.1 47% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 115 108% 168 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 95%
JMicron 1TB 862 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 379GB free Firmware: 8101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 74 74 74 74 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	42% Average	Read 71.9 Write 53.5 Mixed 45.4 SusWrite 74.1 45% 61.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QHY-YK0 Hynix HMT851S6AMR6R-PB 8GB 220 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.1% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 16.3 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 14.5 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 84 48% 84 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook Folio 1040 G1 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G1

CPU
Core i5-4300UIntelBench 44%, 36,631 samples	12x
Core i7-4600UIntelBench 49%, 26,548 samples	10x
Core i5-4200UIntel $281Bench 43%, 64,450 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	24x
HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 6,906 samples	1x

SSD
X110 SATA M.2 256GBSanDiskBench 76%, 2,150 samples	11x
IT L8T-256L9G-HP 256GBLiteonBench 81%, 601 samples	3x
860 EVO M.2 500GBSamsungBench 101%, 35,237 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173QHY-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 94 samples	5x
HMT451B6AFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173QHY-YK0 8GBHynixBench 48%, 173 samples	5x
M471B5173QHY-YK0 Micron 8KTS51264HDZ-1G6E1 8GBSamsungBench 47%, 36 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16