Lenovo 20EG000AGE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20EG000AGE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EG000AGE
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150730
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 26 '19 at 14:07
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 79
1-Core 107
2-Core 216
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 527
59% 466 Pts
64-Core 534
33% 534 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 221E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.16% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 7.46
Parallax 7.38
4% 6.41 fps
MRender 6.95
Gravity 2.63
Splatting 8.83
5% 6.14 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.16%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HCHP-000L1 512GB
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT04L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 399 368 371 373 374 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 399
Mixed 280
SusWrite 378
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 28.3
113% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 277
229% 329 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8.2
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 30%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback