Teclast F7

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	9.01% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Teclast F7 (all builds)
Motherboard	TECLAST F7
Memory	2.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180321
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '19 at 12:06
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3450 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	34.4% Below average	Memory 43.7 1-Core 41.7 2-Core 82.7 33% 56 Pts	4-Core 147 8-Core 146 20% 147 Pts	64-Core 145 9% 145 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.41% Terrible	Lighting 2.27 Reflection 3.19 Parallax 2.16 2% 2.54 fps	MRender 4.14 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 5.83 4% 4.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.41% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Teclast 128GB NS550-2242 128GB 331 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0616B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 202 22 86 73 55 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	9.01% Terrible	Read 27.2 Write 3.2 Mixed 270 SusWrite 78.3 22% 94.6 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.5 12% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 9.01% Great: 59%
SMI USB DISK 64GB 1,634 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 59GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 16 16 14 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 35.8 Write 26.7 Mixed 29.5 SusWrite 15.2 35% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 3.5 240% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 40%
SDHC Card 16GB 8,111 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 8GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	4.34% Terrible	Read 19.5 Write 5.3 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 5 10% 8.82 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.8 34% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.34% Great: 24%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB 3,622 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 28GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 17 13 1.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 29.3 Write 22.2 Mixed 8.7 SusWrite 15 23% 18.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 1.5 83% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1.5GB 1,884 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	26.7% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 9.5 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 4.1 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 186 22% 186 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F7 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Teclast F7

CPU
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	12x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	12x

SSD
128GB NS550-2242 128GBTeclastBench 45%, 331 samples	7x
240GB 240GBSSDBench 64%, 5,968 samples	2x
256GB 256GBDogfishBench 69%, 890 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x1.5GBABCDBench 24%, 1,884 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16