Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 89% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus Z10PE-D16 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory	120.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190410
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '19 at 10:47
Run Duration	425 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 987 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 76.5 1-Core 78.2 2-Core 156 61% 103 Pts	4-Core 312 8-Core 614 55% 463 Pts	64-Core 2,028 126% 2,028 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% EVGA(3842 2990) CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.5% Very good	Lighting 101 Reflection 109 Parallax 96 82% 102 fps	MRender 85.9 Gravity 92.3 Splatting 82.9 71% 87 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 83%
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Zotac(19DA 2516) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	105% Outstanding	Lighting 131 Reflection 122 Parallax 141 107% 132 fps	MRender 175 Gravity 125 Splatting 99.4 105% 133 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 960GB-$397 1,581 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 894GB free Firmware: 001B SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 126 124 130 131 130 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 390 Write 486 Mixed 339 SusWrite 129 76% 336 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 68.8 4K Mixed 35 123% 43.8 MB/s	DQ Read 308 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 66.4 121% 237 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 111%
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300 8,179 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 559GB free Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 917 509 514 508 513 509 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 85% Great: 132%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$97 85,928 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 642GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 215 216 209 208 208 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 717 Write 635 Mixed 618 SusWrite 219 122% 547 MB/s	4K Read 46.4 4K Write 73.8 4K Mixed 54.7 180% 58.3 MB/s	DQ Read 451 DQ Write 395 DQ Mixed 420 316% 422 MB/s
Poor: 175% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 372%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$100 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 305GB free Firmware: R070 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 121 129 128 126 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Read 316 Write 480 Mixed 374 SusWrite 127 73% 324 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 73.2 4K Mixed 35.2 122% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 359 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 335 246% 325 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 105%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$100 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 536GB free Firmware: R070 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 191 189 189 184 185 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Read 297 Write 383 Mixed 250 SusWrite 188 63% 280 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 74.6 4K Mixed 27.2 104% 40.5 MB/s	DQ Read 267 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 201 168% 243 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 105%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 332GB free Firmware: R070 SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 472 286 249 247 248 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Read 330 Write 478 Mixed 371 SusWrite 324 85% 376 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 72.9 4K Mixed 35.5 121% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 344 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 324 245% 328 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 99%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 1,997 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2.5TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 155 160 162 159 159 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 106 Write 108 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 158 25% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 10.7 4K Mixed 0.7 7% 3.97 MB/s	DQ Read 1.2 DQ Write 7.5 DQ Mixed 2.2 2% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 18%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: ACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 173 173 180 174 177 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	Read 151 Write 168 Mixed 31 SusWrite 174 94% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 136% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2.5TB free Firmware: ACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 114 119 120 120 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	78.7% Very good	Read 156 Write 156 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 118 84% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 108%
Seagate ST8000NE0021-2EN 8TB 98 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 3TB free Firmware: EN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 25 23 23 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 67% Great: 127%
Inateck 2TB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 127 127 127 126 127 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 130 Write 93 Mixed 68 SusWrite 126 137% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 1.2 182% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 61%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 20TB 307 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 10.5TB free, PID 25f6 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 208 204 208 211 209 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	99.7% Outstanding	Read 292 Write 321 Mixed 146 SusWrite 209 320% 242 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.6 158% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 99.7% Great: 141%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M386A4G40DM1-CRC 4x31.8GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 4 of 16 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (93^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	82.7% Excellent	MC Read 50.5 MC Write 25.1 MC Mixed 22 93% 32.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 15.3 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 87.4 46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z10PE-D16 WS Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 72%

Battleship

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31stBench 66%, 886 samples	24x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v41stBench 64%, 1,389 samples	22x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples	17x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	26x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	22x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	18x

SSD
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)WD $74Bench 277%, 114,373 samples	11x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x

RAM
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	26x
HMA84GR7MFR4N-TF 4x31.8GBHynixBench 85%, 82 samples	11x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $348

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16