Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJun 26 '19 at 05:26
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 78.8
1-Core 38.2
2-Core 70.1
43% 62.4 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 162
18% 142 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
EVGA(3842 2676) 2GB
CLim: 1238 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20.9% Poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 31
Parallax 32.7
18% 28.6 fps
MRender 41.7
Gravity 26.6
Splatting 30.7
27% 33 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 161 162 152 152 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 305
Write 219
Mixed 236
SusWrite 158
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 25
81% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 197
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
89GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 103 106 103 107 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 99.7
Write 58.5
Mixed 73
SusWrite 104
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 112%
Rocketfish 16GB
15GB free, PID 0224
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
5.81% Terrible
Read 17
Write 8.8
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 11.1
13% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.81%
Great: 7%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 8GB
7GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.4 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 21.5
Write 13.5
Mixed 15.8
SusWrite 4.5
17% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.1
144% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9.6
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,214
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback