Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	90.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 86.2 1-Core 70.7 2-Core 139 61% 98.8 Pts	4-Core 267 8-Core 424 42% 346 Pts	64-Core 414 26% 414 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 3FC9) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (53^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90.2% Outstanding	Lighting 115 Reflection 115 Parallax 120 94% 117 fps	MRender 134 Gravity 97.9 Splatting 81.7 83% 105 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 150GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,223 Write 2,647 Mixed 2,722 638% 2,864 MB/s	4K Read 193 4K Write 150 4K Mixed 152 566% 165 MB/s	DQ Read 508 DQ Write 367 DQ Mixed 430 323% 435 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 217GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 66 65 63 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	42% Average	Read 82 Write 81.2 Mixed 66.5 SusWrite 64.1 54% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-1866C10-8GAB000 F3-1866C10-8GAB000 16GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 800, 800 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	43.4% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 15.3 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 11.9 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	2x
FLFG45F-D8KQ9 1x8GBKingmaxBench 27%, 115 samples	2x

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $308

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16