Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '19 at 21:07
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130T-$60
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 93.4
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 136
66% 105 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 224
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3649) 2GB
CLim: 1437 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 22.3
21% 22.2 fps
MRender 27.1
Gravity 26.4
Splatting 19
19% 24.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 89 91 83 94 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 95.9
Write 119
Mixed 112
SusWrite 88.4
24% 104 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 12
34% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 62.1
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 82.2
66% 89.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 73%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
100GB free
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 97 112 105 91 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 319
Write 129
Mixed 175
SusWrite 102
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 22.7
88% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 95.2
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 104
80% 108 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 73%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
830GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 172 181 180 180 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 187
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 176
104% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 18.1
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 61.1
65% 61.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 2,992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $297
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback