Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 25 '19 at 18:29
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i9-9900K-$485
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
77.8% Very good
SC Int 108
SC Float 115
SC Mixed 110
77% 111 Pts
QC Int 433
QC Float 460
QC Mixed 446
80% 446 Pts
MC Int 1,097
MC Float 1,235
MC Mixed 1186
79% 1,172 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$750
Nvidia(10DE 1B06) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Lighting 535
Reflection 513
Parallax 568
169% 538 fps
MRender 273
Gravity 548
Splatting 293
165% 371 fps
Poor: 57%
This bench: 167%
Great: 176%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
687GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1520 1329 1632 1616 1626 1624 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 1,765
Write 1,520
Mixed 571
SusWrite 1558
303% 1,353 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 59.2
199% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,094
DQ Write 831
DQ Mixed 934
706% 953 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 270%
Great: 326%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
4GB free
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 100 123 104 110 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48% Average
Read 217
Write 147
Mixed 188
SusWrite 106
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 29.8
4K Mixed 33
84% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 99.4
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 123
93% 122 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48%
Great: 79%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$79
628GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 101 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 96.7
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 99.8
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 87%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$37
298GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 80 82 80 80 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 118
Write 108
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 80.1
60% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$26
55GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 76 75 75 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 71
Write 69.5
Mixed 49
SusWrite 75.4
49% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2A2666C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
74.8% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 94%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical TUF Z390-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 137%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 129% - Outstanding Total price: $1,377
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $252Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $728SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback