Lenovo 81FK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81FK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '19 at 15:02
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 85.1
1-Core 78.1
2-Core 135
63% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 300
32% 249 Pts
64-Core 355
24% 355 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 90%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
HFM128GDHTNG-8310A 128GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80060C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 189 186 187 182 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 802
Write 403
Mixed 386
SusWrite 192
98% 446 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 22.7
116% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 233
177% 240 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 121%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
910GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 131 126 121 129 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 127
Write 133
Mixed 57
SusWrite 128
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.1
113% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 12.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 81FK Builds (Compare 3,220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Lenovo 81FK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $335Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback