Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190430
Uptime15.8 Days
Run DateJun 25 '19 at 09:56
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 77.5
2-Core 157
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 215
31% 226 Pts
64-Core 289
19% 289 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1391) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3086
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.2% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 84.5
8% 48.2 fps
MRender 18.6
Gravity 91.6
Splatting 110
22% 73.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 52%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 210 206 212 209 203 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 595
Write 664
Mixed 580
SusWrite 223
116% 515 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 18.7
74% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 572
DQ Write 397
DQ Mixed 416
329% 462 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 125%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
626GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 131 131 132 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 136
Write 122
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 131
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.6
229% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
34.8% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 10.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 10.2
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,037 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $335Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback