Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics78.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171212
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 25 '19 at 00:42
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 141
2-Core 284
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 812
85% 684 Pts
64-Core 810
50% 810 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.2% Very good
Lighting 95.4
Reflection 108
Parallax 101
78% 102 fps
MRender 95
Gravity 94.3
Splatting 99.2
79% 96.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 83 80 80 84 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 437
Mixed 388
SusWrite 85.2
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 51.3
197% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 178
155% 236 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
149GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 458 471 471 473 474 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 449
Mixed 376
SusWrite 461
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 64.9
219% 78.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 132%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
441GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 134 137 138 137 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 140
Write 130
Mixed 74
SusWrite 137
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
1TB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 140 143 143 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 144
Write 186
Mixed 126
SusWrite 141
206% 149 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.9
204% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3000C16K4 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 26.9
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 34.4
SC Mixed 28.2
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 52.2
77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback