| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG NP300E4C-G01AE |
| Memory | 2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130627 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 24 '19 at 22:42 |
| Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
| Run User | ARE-User |
| Background CPU | 27% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
47.7%
Average
|
40% 62.9 Pts
|
24% 187 Pts
|
13% 203 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C652) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2712
|
3.27%
Terrible
|
3% 3.58 fps
|
4% 4.63 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX002F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 82 80 64 71 MB/s
|
42.9%
Average
|
44% 60.4 MB/s
|
103% 0.6 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Cruzer U 32GB
25GB free, PID 55a5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 2.5 2 2.8 2 2.8 MB/s
|
7.82%
Terrible
|
10% 10.5 MB/s
|
117% 2.6 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
31.6%
Below average
|
30% 10.5 GB/s
|
31% 10.9 GB/s
|
35% 113 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 1,054 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 348x |
| Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples | 151x |
| Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples | 93x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $80 |