Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 89.9 1-Core 88 2-Core 172 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 334 42% 322 Pts	64-Core 332 20% 332 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Nvidia(10DE 1087) 1GB CLim: 967 MHz, MLim: 500 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	5.97% Terrible	Lighting 7.47 Reflection 7.77 Parallax 8.59 6% 7.94 fps	MRender 5.52 Gravity 7.77 Splatting 7.48 6% 6.92 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.97% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900612 SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 74 54 55 53 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Read 307 Write 207 Mixed 235 SusWrite 82.7 46% 208 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 24.8 95% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 154 135% 198 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 64D0JKHHJ 1x8GB 215 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9.3 27% 9.33 GB/s	Latency 67.3 59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	16x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	4x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 48%, 671 samples	2x
HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 Nanya NT2GC64B88G0NF-CG HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 8GBHynixBench 49%, 2 samples	2x
NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 12GBNanyaBench 41%, 2 samples	2x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $310

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16