Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675 4,275 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 91.9 1-Core 77.3 2-Core 169 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 549 54% 443 Pts	64-Core 1,199 74% 1,199 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 0780) 2GB Driver: 353.30 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	6.77% Terrible	Lighting 9.17 Reflection 14.2 Parallax 9.59 8% 11 fps	MRender 15.9 Gravity 7 Splatting 0.13 5% 7.66 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.77% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 51GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 163 178 217 234 230 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51% Above average	Read 254 Write 84.3 Mixed 189 SusWrite 208 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 39.2 4K Mixed 19.5 74% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 64.6 DQ Mixed 95.3 78% 114 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 86%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43 15,932 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 64 28 47 64 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 13.2 Write 38.2 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 50.8 22% 30.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 124% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 58%
OCZ ET1208AD 1GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 1GB free, PID 0163 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 32.4 Write 14.7 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 15 24% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 38% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 82GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	49.3% Average	MC Read 21 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 18.6 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 8.5 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 64.3 62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	297x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	272x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	252x

RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples	21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples	20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	17x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16