Performance Results


Gaming 120% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 110% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190322
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '19 at 18:20
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Memory 87 1-Core 136 2-Core 270 90% 164 Pts	4-Core 443 8-Core 784 74% 614 Pts	64-Core 898 56% 898 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Gigabyte(1458 37BD) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	145% Outstanding	Lighting 198 Reflection 201 Parallax 219 161% 206 fps	MRender 235 Gravity 192 Splatting 128 146% 185 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 145% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 108 100 89 95 85 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 429 Mixed 395 SusWrite 133 81% 363 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 59.3 205% 74.2 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 355 268% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 31GB free Firmware: EXM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 463 465 482 351 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 478 Mixed 386 SusWrite 387 99% 439 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 48.6 176% 65.4 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 354 269% 362 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 363GB free Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 125 129 132 127 134 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Read 170 Write 142 Mixed 80.3 SusWrite 129 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C17 2x8GB 638 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	60.2% Good	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 22.8 MC Mixed 19.3 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.4 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 70.4 57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 134%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	149x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	121x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	110x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	154x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $1,035

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16