Asus H110M-R

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-R (all builds)
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170320
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '19 at 09:55
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7100-$70 79,299 User benchmarks, average bench 57% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 89.9 1-Core 114 2-Core 221 81% 142 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 337 45% 334 Pts	64-Core 339 21% 339 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 425.31 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.86% Terrible	Lighting 4.57 Reflection 4.38 Parallax 4.34 4% 4.43 fps	MRender 4.62 Gravity 3.87 Splatting 6.13 4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.86% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
120gb SSD 120GB 3,247 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 159 54 103 65 70 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 394 Write 74.5 Mixed 146 SusWrite 81.3 38% 174 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 69.9 4K Mixed 7.2 77% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 83.6 DQ Write 216 DQ Mixed 13.1 49% 104 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 80%
Seagate ST3200826AS 200GB 2,004 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 137GB free Firmware: 3.03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 63 62 63 63 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 58.1 Write 66 Mixed 44.6 SusWrite 62.9 43% 57.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 37%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 1GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 4.4 4.5 4.4 4.8 4.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	3.09% Terrible	Read 8.8 Write 1 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 4.3 5% 4.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.09% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GY2133D464L15S/8G 1x8GB 616 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 10.7 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 11.7 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 67.3 59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,548 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-R

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	924x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	374x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	273x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	524x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	340x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	304x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	246x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	144x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	120x

RAM
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	114x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	94x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	40x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16