HP EliteBook 8570p

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 8570p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 17A7
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130131
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 24 '19 at 04:56
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3540M-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 172
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 241
32% 242 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon IT LCS-128L9S-HP 128GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9C08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 309 307 300 302 308 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 409
Write 308
Mixed 195
SusWrite 306
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 18.2
67% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 69.8
DQ Mixed 87.3
71% 102 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 98%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
228GB free
Firmware: GS2OA340
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 30.1
Mixed 34
42% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 18.2
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 18.8
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8570p Builds (Compare 452 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $199
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback