ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_R570ZD

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_R570ZD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X570ZD
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181127
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '19 at 01:25
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 61,910 User benchmarks, average bench 49% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 71.5 1-Core 110 2-Core 204 72% 129 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 543 57% 457 Pts	64-Core 538 33% 538 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU) 85,536 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 11D1) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: NDA Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Lighting 13.6 Reflection 24.7 Parallax 17.8 11% 18.7 fps	MRender 12.3 Gravity 12.9 Splatting 17.1 12% 14.1 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 65 123 93 137 138 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 430 Write 334 Mixed 260 SusWrite 122 64% 286 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 22.6 4K Mixed 13.9 56% 18 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 65.1 DQ Mixed 39.2 41% 69 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 55%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 927GB free Firmware: SDM4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 121 123 118 123 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Read 127 Write 141 Mixed 54 SusWrite 121 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 71%
General UDisk 4GB 5,358 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.9 5.3 4.7 5.6 4.8 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	5.77% Terrible	Read 19.1 Write 1 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 4.8 8% 7.55 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 31% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.77% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB 36,396 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	66.7% Good	MC Read 24.5 MC Write 23.4 MC Mixed 21.9 66% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 28.1 SC Mixed 22.3 67% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 97.9 41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_R570ZD Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_R570ZD

CPU
Ryzen 5 2500UAMDBench 49%, 61,910 samples	32x

GPU
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	24x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	8x

SSD
RBUSNS8180DS3512GJ 512GBKingstonBench 62%, 221 samples	11x
SD9SN8W512G1002 512GBSandiskBench 79%, 1,003 samples	5x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	3x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	12x
D23.22240H.001 1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 151 samples	3x
BL8G32C16S4B.8FE 2x8GBUnknownBench 82%, 634 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback