Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180122
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 24 '19 at 01:01
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X-$102
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 68.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 212
70% 128 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 386
48% 364 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.2% Above average
Lighting 64
Reflection 67.1
Parallax 65.3
52% 65.4 fps
MRender 69.8
Gravity 61.3
Splatting 53.5
50% 61.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 12 40 9.9 46 2.9 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.5% Poor
Read 174
Write 102
Mixed 89.2
SusWrite 38.5
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 15.1
60% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 39.3
DQ Write 49.6
DQ Mixed 47.1
35% 45.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
762GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 195 195 194 189 197 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 117
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 194
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
931GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 115 116 112 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 148
Write 116
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 115
149% 114 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.8
185% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
79.5% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 28.5
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 23
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $322
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $185Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback