Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 123% UFO	Desktop 109% UFO	Workstation 119% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	325% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '19 at 22:38
Run Duration	279 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$258 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Memory 96.8 1-Core 159 2-Core 319 105% 192 Pts	4-Core 637 8-Core 1229 111% 933 Pts	64-Core 1,249 77% 1,249 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	111% Outstanding	Lighting 144 Reflection 165 Parallax 136 117% 148 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 167 Splatting 116 108% 134 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 269GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1997 850 804 790 812 785 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	325% Outstanding	Read 2,623 Write 2,287 Mixed 1800 SusWrite 1,006 431% 1,929 MB/s	4K Read 68.5 4K Write 154 4K Mixed 91.9 303% 105 MB/s	DQ Read 1,579 DQ Write 1,316 DQ Mixed 1,434 1,078% 1,443 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 325% Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 54GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 298 294 298 297 293 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 484 Mixed 409 SusWrite 316 96% 429 MB/s	4K Read 48 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 60.9 209% 72.7 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 356 268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 162GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 318 315 318 319 306 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 518 Write 478 Mixed 455 SusWrite 338 101% 447 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 49.8 173% 64.3 MB/s	DQ Read 269 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 144 120% 177 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 129%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 596GB free Firmware: MN6OA5Q0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 101 99 101 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 90 Write 85.3 Mixed 52 SusWrite 99 60% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 85%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113 12,948 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 635GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 61 60 62 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 73.5 Write 75 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 59.7 48% 65.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 60%
WD l_CT500 External 500GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 214GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 40 39 40 39 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	77.1% Very good	Read 38.3 Write 39.5 Mixed 38.7 SusWrite 39.1 54% 38.9 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 19.5 4K Mixed 15.2 1,229% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 13.7 DQ Write 19.8 DQ Mixed 15.6 1,255% 16.4 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMT16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB 1,712 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 40.2 MC Write 41 MC Mixed 33.1 109% 38.1 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 44 SC Mixed 32 94% 32.9 GB/s	Latency 50.9 79% 50.9 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 130%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,473 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $440

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $427Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,850x
Core i7-9700KIntel $258Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,605x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $321Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	553x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,302x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	649x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	639x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	856x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	564x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	487x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	288x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	278x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	252x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $1,384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16