Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3600+ 784 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	33.8% Below average	Memory 57.9 1-Core 29.1 2-Core 57.6 32% 48.2 Pts	4-Core 58.3 8-Core 58.6 8% 58.4 Pts	64-Core 57.9 4% 57.9 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 41%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
INTENSO 128GB 3,345 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 132 58 58 58 58 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.4% Average	Read 232 Write 142 Mixed 147 SusWrite 88.5 34% 152 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 21.4 82% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 25.6 DQ Write 44.6 DQ Mixed 27 23% 32.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 91%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$50 16,391 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 83GB free Firmware: 3.AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 78 78 78 78 78 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 77.5 Write 47.5 Mixed 43.4 SusWrite 76.9 45% 61.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 44%
Intenso Alu Line 16GB 713 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 12GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 8 9.6 8.6 8.8 9.6 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	4.83% Terrible	Read 14.2 Write 2.2 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 8.7 9% 7.95 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.83% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 15% null MHz 1024, 512, 512 MB Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10% Very poor	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 2.6 8% 2.77 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.6 9% 3.3 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16