Asrock 970 Performance/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Performance/3.1  (all builds)
Memory16.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150401
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJun 23 '19 at 18:47
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 79.3
1-Core 63.6
2-Core 128
55% 90.2 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 297
33% 260 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.3% Average
Lighting 56.8
Reflection 62
Parallax 90.3
46% 69.7 fps
MRender 61.5
Gravity 56.2
Splatting 79.7
55% 65.8 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 196 187 175 154 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 462
Write 320
Mixed 218
SusWrite 176
65% 294 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 27.8
95% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 216
172% 239 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 101%
PNY CS1211 240GB SSD 754D117-820
24GB free
Firmware: CS121101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 298 179 293 298 296 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 430
Write 296
Mixed 274
SusWrite 273
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 27.5
91% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 169
143% 209 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 93%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 122 121 119 119 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 122
Write 118
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 121
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
751GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3FD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 87 88 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 71
Write 78
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 88.5
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16G-D3-1600-MR 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.5% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Performance/3.1 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Performance/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $570
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback