Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2830 10,608 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Memory 24.1 1-Core 21 2-Core 22.2 15% 22.4 Pts	4-Core 34.7 8-Core 32.7 5% 33.7 Pts	64-Core 30.4 2% 30.4 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 37%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545032A7E680 320GB 627 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: GGBOAF10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 60 53 35 24 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	25.9% Poor	Read 44.9 Write 35.8 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 45.1 28% 37.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 76% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Apacer 76.A305G.C4D0B 1x2GB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.9 GB/s	SC Read 0.7 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 1.7 5% 1.63 GB/s	Latency 292 14% 292 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 17%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N2830IntelBench 29%, 10,608 samples	153x
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	79x
Celeron N2815IntelBench 27%, 1,028 samples	58x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	338x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	136x
ASU16D3LS1KBG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 20%, 728 samples	50x
AO1L16BC4R1-BQ7S 1x4GBAdataBench 17%, 369 samples	32x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16