Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-HDV (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20171102
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '19 at 16:31
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X-$102 38,959 User benchmarks, average bench 65% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 72.2 1-Core 109 2-Core 217 73% 133 Pts	4-Core 435 8-Core 436 58% 435 Pts	64-Core 427 26% 427 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3287) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 372.54 Performing below potential (99^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (71 fps cap detected)	57.5% Above average	Lighting 70.6 Reflection 70.8 Parallax 68.4 58% 69.9 fps	MRender 72.4 Gravity 67 Splatting 71.3 58% 70.3 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gamer L TA1D0240A 240GB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 182 113 127 69 75 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	72.4% Very good	Read 457 Write 290 Mixed 320 SusWrite 128 66% 299 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 70.4 4K Mixed 29.2 118% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 271 DQ Mixed 168 146% 214 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 88%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71 21,137 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 272GB free Firmware: PB4OC60F SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 81 80 81 80 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	46% Average	Read 80.3 Write 62.3 Mixed 42.3 SusWrite 80.2 49% 66.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 62% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x4GB 16,770 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 30.3 MC Mixed 28.1 85% 29.7 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 23.2 69% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 96.4 42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 831 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

CPU
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	162x
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples	85x
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	103x
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	50x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	42x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	19x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	13x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x4GBUnknownBench 75%, 7,488 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $231

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16