Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
12 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 23 '19 at 16:08
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8320E-$249
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 62
2-Core 110
58% 87.9 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 407
41% 326 Pts
64-Core 407
27% 407 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$140
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.6.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Lighting 194
Reflection 179
Parallax 285
51% 219 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 188
Splatting 131
52% 154 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 52%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$138
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 123 114 123 113 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 485
Write 454
Mixed 311
SusWrite 144
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 44
150% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 146
138% 216 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 107%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78
213GB free
Firmware: 02.01C03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 47.2
Write 46.9
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 35
31% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 35%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 750GB
186GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
34% Below average
Read 78.9
Write 79.4
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 79.2
89% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 11.4
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 67%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 8,716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $126

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $437
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $56
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback