Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 20%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory53.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180420
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 23 '19 at 13:27
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-5820K-$391
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
20% Very poor
1-Core 33.4
2-Core 59.9
22% 46.7 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 334
26% 221 Pts
64-Core 736
49% 736 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 20%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti-$1,088
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 200
Parallax 698
59% 343 fps
MRender 502
Gravity 627
Splatting 310
158% 480 fps
Poor: 132%
This bench: 102%
Great: 183%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 512GB-$500
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 193 219 196 207 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 362
Write 257
Mixed 226
SusWrite 202
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 18.4
66% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 78.9
DQ Mixed 106
85% 122 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 85%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$300
307GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 291 325 311 338 366 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 288
Write 170
Mixed 306
SusWrite 319
61% 271 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 25.2
84% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 140
122% 180 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 117%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$101
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 189 185 185 189 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 193
Mixed 68
SusWrite 186
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$101
697GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 129 128 128 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 155
Write 148
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 127
83% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 81%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
74.3% Very good
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 31.1
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 11.2
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 152%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 3,894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $1,303
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198AMD RX 580 $167Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback