Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics169% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory53.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180420
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 23 '19 at 13:27
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$198
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 33.4
2-Core 59.9
42% 58.6 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 334
26% 221 Pts
64-Core 736
49% 736 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$1,300
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
169% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 200
Parallax 698
34% 343 fps
MRender 502
Gravity 627
Splatting 310
176% 480 fps
Poor: 141%
This bench: 169%
Great: 201%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 512GB-$500
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 193 219 196 207 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 362
Write 257
Mixed 226
SusWrite 202
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 18.4
66% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 78.9
DQ Mixed 106
85% 122 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 85%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$300
307GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 291 325 311 338 366 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 288
Write 170
Mixed 306
SusWrite 319
61% 271 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 25.2
84% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 140
122% 180 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 117%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$152
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 189 185 185 189 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 193
Mixed 68
SusWrite 186
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$152
697GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 129 128 128 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 155
Write 148
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 127
83% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
74.3% Very good
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 31.1
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 11.2
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,076 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $1,089
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $192Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $151Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $328Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $47
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback