Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics57.7% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 23 '19 at 06:02
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5820K-$391
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
27.8% Poor
SC Int 32.3
SC Float 33.1
SC Mixed 32.7
26% 32.7 Pts
QC Int 104
QC Float 107
QC Mixed 107
24% 106 Pts
MC Int 440
MC Float 575
MC Mixed 579
79% 531 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$450
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Lighting 131
Reflection 153
Parallax 162
44% 149 fps
MRender 160
Gravity 161
Splatting 165
68% 162 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 145%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 154 162 26 186 171 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
47% Average
Read 319
Write 328
Mixed 237
SusWrite 161
59% 261 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 17
43% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 193
157% 219 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 47%
Great: 102%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$79
921GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 136 151 132 147 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 151
Write 141
Mixed 78
SusWrite 141
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$55
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 185 191 188 192 194 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 148
Mixed 77
SusWrite 189
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 106%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 8GX-D4-3000-MR 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
28.2% Poor
MC Read 12
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 10
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 9.1
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 101%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 2,009 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $258

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $1,218
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $248Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $70G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $606SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback