Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '19 at 03:33
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-5930K-$295
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
78.4% Very good
1-Core 117
2-Core 220
80% 169 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 724
73% 580 Pts
64-Core 924
62% 924 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$415
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Lighting 313
Reflection 263
Parallax 252
82% 276 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 309
Splatting 238
84% 250 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 85%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$230
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 471 469 474 414 459 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 324
Mixed 360
SusWrite 458
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 48.6
177% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 322
243% 328 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 117%
Great: 125%
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$50
238GB free
Firmware: AADA4105 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 583 321 318 318 325 325 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,678
Write 486
Mixed 1,053
SusWrite 365
197% 895 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 61.2
215% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 748
DQ Write 801
DQ Mixed 632
515% 727 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 190%
Great: 187%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$38
749GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 177 177 176 176 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 163
Mixed 98
SusWrite 176
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 100%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4-2800C16-8GRK F4-3200C16-8GVKB F4-2800C16-8GRK F4-3200C16-8GVKB F4-2800C16-8GRK F4-3200C16-8GVKB F4-2800C16-8GRK F4-3200C16-8GVKB 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 47.2
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 47.2
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 25.1
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 119%
Great: 119%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 3,368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $958
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback