| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-C (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160118 |
| Uptime | 3 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 22 '19 at 23:22 |
| Run Duration | 119 Seconds |
| Run User | ROU-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.9%
Good
|
78% 134 Pts
|
39% 296 Pts
|
18% 297 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 84F6) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
3.38%
Terrible
|
3% 3.98 fps
|
3% 4.35 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
36% 47.6 MB/s
|
162% 1.13 MB/s
| ||
|
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 34 37 39 41 43 MB/s
|
23%
Poor
|
23% 31.8 MB/s
|
69% 0.53 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GEIL CL16-16-16 D4-2400 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
36.2%
Below average
|
34% 11.8 GB/s
|
31% 10.9 GB/s
|
60% 67.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-C Builds (Compare 1,039 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-C
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 176x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 146x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 116x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 98x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 89x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 68x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $166 |