Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	88.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140403
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '19 at 22:07
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Memory 85.8 1-Core 77 2-Core 155 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 474 46% 378 Pts	64-Core 451 28% 451 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 37D9) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.5% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 113 Parallax 116 91% 113 fps	MRender 131 Gravity 98.9 Splatting 84.8 84% 105 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,614 Write 3,014 Mixed 3,027 717% 3,218 MB/s	4K Read 207 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 136 551% 154 MB/s	DQ Read 512 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 443 325% 430 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 65GB free Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 56 55 55 56 55 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	62.3% Good	Read 370 Write 193 Mixed 263 SusWrite 87.5 51% 228 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 80.7 4K Mixed 21.3 112% 43.3 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 243 DQ Mixed 134 120% 180 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 85%
Toshiba MK5065GSXF 500GB 2,703 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 247GB free Firmware: GV10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 15 9.5 15 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Read 68.7 Write 17.6 Mixed 15.3 SusWrite 12.5 21% 28.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 44%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78 8,440 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 82GB free Firmware: 02.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 61 61 61 61 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 59.5 Write 59.9 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 60.9 40% 54.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 35%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 2TB 5,029 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 765GB free Firmware: 0108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 91 95 95 95 96 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 71.5 Write 90.5 Mixed 85.8 SusWrite 94.3 64% 85.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.6 203% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 66%
WD My Passport 0740 500GB 3,483 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 466GB free, PID 0740 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 85 83 84 84 83 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 91.5 Write 91.4 Mixed 55.9 SusWrite 83.3 108% 80.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown IMT451U6MFR8W-TA2 4x4GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.8% Average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 16 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 12.3 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	379x
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	43x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $729

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16