Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 135%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics142% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190314
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 22 '19 at 18:59
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-9700K-$362
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
110% Outstanding
SC Int 138
SC Float 149
SC Mixed 126
110% 138 Pts
QC Int 547
QC Float 597
QC Mixed 568
129% 571 Pts
MC Int 929
MC Float 1,157
MC Mixed 993
153% 1,026 Pts
Poor: 98%
This bench: 110%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$450
Gigabyte(1458 37B5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Lighting 435
Reflection 333
Parallax 416
132% 395 fps
MRender 384
Gravity 403
Splatting 240
149% 342 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 142%
Great: 144%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.1 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 630 630 589 594 567 590 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,855
Write 1939
Mixed 718
SusWrite 600
285% 1,278 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 59.6
213% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1381
DQ Write 1,287
DQ Mixed 1,301
986% 1323 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 236%
Great: 240%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$70
103GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 292 312 310 314 311 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 481
Mixed 463
SusWrite 294
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 57.3
191% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 233
206% 309 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 113%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$70
281GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 487 488 489 399 283 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 486
Mixed 462
SusWrite 439
107% 475 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 56.8
190% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 264
223% 326 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 122%
Great: 129%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$51
907GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 88 89 116 126 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 78
Write 78.3
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 97.8
50% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
415GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 155 156 155 158 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 148
Write 150
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 155
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$326
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 32.5
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 44.1
SC Mixed 29.9
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 104%
Great: 115%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 3,794 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 142%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $183

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 132% - Outstanding Total price: $1,398
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $248Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $70G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $607SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback