Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	68.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	ECT ONE GAMING Ultra IN07 ASUS ED (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK PRIME B450-PLUS
Memory	25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190228
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '19 at 15:06
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Memory 75.7 1-Core 126 2-Core 248 82% 150 Pts	4-Core 476 8-Core 738 75% 607 Pts	64-Core 1,154 71% 1,154 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Asus(1043 86A3) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	68.1% Good	Lighting 86.8 Reflection 80.8 Parallax 72.9 71% 80.2 fps	MRender 92.7 Gravity 74.8 Splatting 67.9 63% 78.5 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 512GB 5,144 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 397GB free (System drive) Firmware: AP613PE0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 267 105 103 102 105 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.8% Below average	Read 146 Write 75.3 Mixed 59.5 SusWrite 163 25% 111 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 19.8 4K Mixed 11.4 51% 16.2 MB/s	DQ Read 14.1 DQ Write 15.2 DQ Mixed 14.7 11% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 915GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 128 136 139 142 140 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 72 Write 109 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 135 73% 99.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 63% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 1,450 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1.5TB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 15 17 17 18 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	4.91% Terrible	Read 5.7 Write 5.2 Mixed 6.5 SusWrite 15.8 12% 8.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 4.91% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.M16FD 2x16GB 421 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.6% Very good	MC Read 27 MC Write 23.3 MC Mixed 25.3 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 19.5 SC Write 24.4 SC Mixed 21.8 63% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 88.8 45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16