Razer Blade

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	7.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DANA_MB
Memory	6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180831
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '19 at 14:48
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Memory 92.9 1-Core 121 2-Core 225 84% 146 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 723 69% 572 Pts	64-Core 828 51% 828 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 2001) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6169 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.02% Terrible	Lighting 7.3 Reflection 69.2 Parallax 7.34 6% 27.9 fps	MRender 10.7 Gravity 6.6 Splatting 14.6 9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.02% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV6-8Q128 128GB 522 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2871302 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 504 Write 447 Mixed 417 102% 456 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 76.3 4K Mixed 40.9 137% 48.7 MB/s	DQ Read 312 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 252 204% 288 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 85%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 697GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 121 124 123 122 123 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	56.5% Above average	Read 77.2 Write 106 Mixed 51.3 SusWrite 118 65% 88.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.6 189% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	MC Read 30.9 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 22.4 78% 27.2 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 29.4 SC Mixed 24.3 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,060x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,071x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	469x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,447x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	597x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	398x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	816x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	249x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,755x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	371x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	290x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16