PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds) |
Memory | 10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160106 |
Uptime | 4.6 Days |
Run Date | Jun 22 '19 at 14:36 |
Run Duration | 196 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
|
18.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX200 SATA M.2 250GB-$90
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 207 172 177 210 195 MB/s
|
52%
Above average
|
|||
49%
Average
|
||||
WD My Book 1230 6TB
5TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 17 17 19 18 MB/s
|
16.2%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Book 1140 3TB
875GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 17 19 18 MB/s
|
12.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLT8G3D1869DT1TX0. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
36.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 138x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 29x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 19x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 22x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 18x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $494 |