Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

Performance Results


Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130920
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '19 at 12:40
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Extreme
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 8,052 User benchmarks, average bench 60% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	66.5% Good	1-Core 98.3 2-Core 195 69% 146 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 383 52% 382 Pts	64-Core 379 25% 379 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$700 124,229 User benchmarks, average bench 120% MSI(1462 3724) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Lighting 538 Reflection 454 Parallax 616 141% 536 fps	MRender 403 Gravity 472 Splatting 266 134% 380 fps
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 5,268 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: BBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 91 83 91 94 84 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.7% Above average	Read 263 Write 127 Mixed 178 SusWrite 89.6 36% 164 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 56.3 4K Mixed 31 102% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 94 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 102 79% 107 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 76%
Seagate ST32000645NS 2TB-$140 558 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2TB free Firmware: 0004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 150 148 151 146 152 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Read 146 Write 146 Mixed 81 SusWrite 149 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170FH0- 4x4GB 215 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled	51.2% Above average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.5 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 11.5 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M720 Builds (Compare 228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 60%, 8,052 samples	152x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $635Bench 64%, 4,802 samples	12x
Xeon E5-1603 0IntelBench 48%, 1,630 samples	10x

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,536 samples	38x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $270Bench 57%, 746,202 samples	31x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 7%, 9,657 samples	24x

SSD
HG5d Q Series 256GBToshiba $225Bench 80%, 1,935 samples	13x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 56%, 6,185 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $53Bench 106%, 546,937 samples	9x

RAM
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 87%, 72 samples	19x
HMT351U7CFR8A 4x4GBHynixBench 89%, 24 samples	17x
HMT351U7CFR8A 2x4GBHynixBench 47%, 12 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $570

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $205	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150	Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375	Nvidia RTX 2060 $349	Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14