HP HPE-310nl

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP HPE-310nl (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2A9C
Memory	4.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '19 at 19:00
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	MAR-User
Background CPU	99%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Memory 58 1-Core 12.2 2-Core 35.7 26% 35.3 Pts	4-Core 75.6 8-Core 314 20% 195 Pts	64-Core 314 19% 314 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	19% Very poor	Lighting 19.5 Reflection 12.4 Parallax 28.1 16% 20 fps	MRender 34.1 Gravity 29.5 Splatting 28.7 25% 30.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GB-$209 7,834 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: LH6i SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 140 150 162 152 154 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.2% Poor	Read 129 Write 130 Mixed 132 SusWrite 147 30% 134 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 8.5 4K Mixed 6.6 19% 6.33 MB/s	DQ Read 88.4 DQ Write 95.3 DQ Mixed 126 86% 103 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 82%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 643GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 98 96 94 99 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 94.3 Write 44.4 Mixed 60.9 SusWrite 93.6 54% 73.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.1 209% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 290GB free Firmware: HP73 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 114 115 116 116 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 108 Write 65.1 Mixed 52 SusWrite 112 62% 84.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 88%
WD Elements 10B8 500GB 1,821 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 348GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 22 Write 20 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 20.2 28% 20.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 39%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB 16,483 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 49GB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 8.2 7.7 7.4 8.5 8.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	4.22% Terrible	Read 10.7 Write 10.5 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 7.9 13% 9.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 14% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 4.22% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
AD80AD80 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 CE80CE80 M378B5173CB0-CK0 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.1% Poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 8.5 21% 7.43 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 2 7% 2.33 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP HPE-310nl

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)