HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8054
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180718
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 21 '19 at 17:17
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-6600-$175
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
67.8% Good
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 193
69% 146 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 383
53% 389 Pts
64-Core 414
28% 414 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
HP(103C 2B4E) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 25.1
5% 20.8 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 16.2
6% 15.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 7%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$50
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 39 40 39 40 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 77% Great: 127%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$90
646GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 339 320 331 326 337 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 421
Write 374
Mixed 350
SusWrite 335
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 38.6
133% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 338
254% 339 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 124%
Seagate SkyHawk 6TB (2016)-$173
5.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 74 77 73 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 31.8
Write 73.9
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 78.5
38% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.3
78% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 109%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 117 117 113 110 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 100
Write 105
Mixed 68
SusWrite 113
71% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
172% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 66%
Jmicron Tech 500GB
420GB free
Firmware: 4207
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 84 84 85 86 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
47% Average
Read 81
Write 75.9
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 82.8
53% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 47%
Great: 64%
Seagate M3 Portable 1TB
389GB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 38 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 34.2
Write 39.8
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 38
27% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.3
138% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 67%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
120GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 56 59 65 58 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 34.7
Write 68.7
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 59.4
41% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.4
154% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 68%
SMI USB disk 8GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.2 4.8 4.8 4.2 4.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Read 23.9
Write 3.3
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 4.3
11% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 11%
Generic External 1TB
321GB free, PID 3920
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 80 80 79 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 77.4
Write 78.6
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 79.3
88% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 71%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$6
6GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 27 11 9.7 9.9 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 112
Write 34.1
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 14.9
58% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 3.2
194% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 32%
Mass Storage Device 1TB
106GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 38 37 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 36.7
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 36.9
45% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 11.9
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 88%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 1,342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $179
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback