Supermicro X9DAi

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Supermicro X9DAi (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DAi
Memory	59 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150509
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '19 at 00:11
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 1,097 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Memory 50.4 1-Core 31.8 2-Core 63.6 31% 48.6 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 269 23% 196 Pts	64-Core 873 54% 873 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000 12,628 User benchmarks, average bench 67% Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.9% Above average	Lighting 52.3 Reflection 76.1 Parallax 80.8 43% 69.7 fps	MRender 89.4 Gravity 84.1 Splatting 92.5 73% 88.7 fps
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 157 161 154 142 137 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 403 Write 334 Mixed 308 SusWrite 161 68% 302 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 34 4K Mixed 19.3 67% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 194 141% 184 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 124%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 212GB free Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1079 570 441 423 390 458 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	137% Outstanding	Read 1,563 Write 1,144 Mixed 898 SusWrite 560 232% 1,041 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 43.8 4K Mixed 29 102% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 204 152% 203 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 283%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 454GB free Firmware: 0C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 92 93 94 92 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 91.2 Write 92 Mixed 71.1 SusWrite 92.3 64% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 62%
WD Re 3TB (2012)-$55 2,104 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 535GB free Firmware: 1K01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 114 118 119 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Read 146 Write 145 Mixed 99.5 SusWrite 116 94% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.1 215% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 96%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 39GB free Firmware: 0C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 19 21 26 24 22 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 29% Great: 62%
WD WD1001FALS-00U9B0 1TB 3,876 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 532GB free Firmware: 0K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 77 79 77 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 83.5 Write 74.1 Mixed 60.6 SusWrite 77.4 55% 73.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 73%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 507GB free Firmware: 0C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 66 64 65 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	41.7% Average	Read 79.7 Write 72.7 Mixed 54.6 SusWrite 65 50% 68 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 62%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 500GB free Firmware: 0C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 82 81 83 83 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Read 100 Write 99.5 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 82.4 66% 89.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965516-051.A 8x8GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	MC Read 24.2 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 27.7 69% 24 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 3.6 13% 4.47 GB/s	Latency 159 25% 159 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 128%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DAi Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 45%

Yacht

System: Supermicro X9DAi

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	15x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v21stBench 64%, 1,265 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	7x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	3x

RAM
EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 32GBElpidaBench 91%, 25 samples	12x
M393B2G70QH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 200 samples	5x
M393B1K70DH0- 8x8GBSamsungBench 95%, 162 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $252

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16