| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | HP EliteBook 8560w (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1631 |
| Memory | 13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20161027 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 20 '19 at 21:18 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.2%
Good
|
57% 93.4 Pts
|
38% 299 Pts
|
21% 337 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD FirePro M5950
HP(103C 1631) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.200.0.0
|
3.88%
Terrible
|
4% 4.3 fps
|
4% 4.84 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 132 137 137 140 134 MB/s
|
57.2%
Above average
|
48% 217 MB/s
|
93% 30.6 MB/s
|
65% 94.9 MB/s
|
|
Netac 240GB 240GB
124GB free
Firmware: 3A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 11 43 28 12 25 MB/s
|
34%
Below average
|
70% 312 MB/s
|
35% 9.77 MB/s
|
6% 15.3 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3
|
47%
Average
|
47% 16.4 GB/s
|
37% 12.9 GB/s
|
51% 77.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical EliteBook 8560w Builds (Compare 466 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP EliteBook 8560w
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2820QMIntel $230Bench 59%, 4,929 samples | 91x |
| Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples | 77x |
| Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples | 64x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples | 287x |
| Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples | 126x |
| FirePro M5950 AMDBench 5%, 1,394 samples | 47x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $258 |