bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DX58SO
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130729
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 20 '19 at 21:07
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
J1PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 137
63% 100 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 263
29% 229 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.6.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Lighting 34.5
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 45.2
28% 36.9 fps
MRender 28.1
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 36.7
27% 31.8 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 212 211 217 211 211 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51% Above average
Read 233
Write 216
Mixed 211
SusWrite 210
49% 217 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 26.3
84% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 35.1
DQ Write 73.6
DQ Mixed 45.3
37% 51.3 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 51%
Great: 133%
WD WD1200BEVS-60UST0 120GB
16GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 32 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 51.3
Write 46
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 31.8
31% 41.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 24%
Great: 29%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
42GB free
Firmware: GG2OAH10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 62 49 49 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 87.3
Write 45
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 53.9
40% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 58%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
176GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 32 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 90.6
Write 80
Mixed 61
SusWrite 31.9
49% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 57%
Seagate ST3120026AS 120GB-$24
99GB free
Firmware: 3.42
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 52 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 51.1
Write 13.8
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 52.1
28% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
35.9% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 10.7
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback