Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H110M-S2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180412
Uptime	8.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '19 at 19:59
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	33%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Memory 76.3 1-Core 130 2-Core 240 82% 149 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 605 63% 508 Pts	64-Core 671 42% 671 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 8619) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.39 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.5% Average	Lighting 60.8 Reflection 61.2 Parallax 52.8 50% 58.3 fps	MRender 53.9 Gravity 56.4 Splatting 58.5 46% 56.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z22000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 181 155 189 193 193 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 440 Write 165 Mixed 185 SusWrite 183 54% 243 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 80 4K Mixed 12.8 92% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 201 DQ Mixed 80.6 92% 158 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 222GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 161 156 163 163 171 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	99.6% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 182 Mixed 80.3 SusWrite 162 111% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot PSD48G213381 2x8GB 584 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.1 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 11.5 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 87.7 46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-S2-CF Builds (Compare 1,920 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	378x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	251x
Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	191x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	275x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	175x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	159x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	104x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	71x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	55x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBCorsair $25Bench 42%, 47,473 samples	87x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	59x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	53x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $207

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16