Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 1,235 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Memory 51.4 1-Core 74.3 2-Core 148 51% 91.3 Pts	4-Core 286 8-Core 447 45% 367 Pts	64-Core 1,053 65% 1,053 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 453 452 450 453 450 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 463 Write 453 Mixed 353 SusWrite 452 97% 430 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 65.7 4K Mixed 37.9 125% 43.7 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 326 253% 347 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 124%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 250GB 1,970 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 41GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	7.48% Terrible	Read 33.7 Write 27.9 Mixed 30.1 SusWrite 28 7% 29.9 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2.8 15% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 7.48% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix-00AD HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GB 808 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	45.1% Average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 16 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 156 26% 156 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 58%

Gunboat

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	96x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	82x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	62x

RAM
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	41x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	39x
M393B1G70BH0-YK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 67%, 378 samples	24x

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $170

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16